2002 Oil Spill May Shed Light on Health Problems for
MONDAY, Aug. 23 (HealthDay News) -- The fate of fishermen
involved in cleaning up a massive oil spill off the northwest coast
of Spain in 2002 could shed light on potential health problems
facing workers involved in the recent Deepwater disaster in the
Gulf of Mexico.
Authors reporting in the Aug. 24 online issue of the
Annals of Internal Medicine found that Spanish fishermen
exposed to the earlier oil spill had higher rates of respiratory
symptoms. Although their lung function was not significantly
different from fishermen who had no contact with the spill, the
exposed individuals were more likely to have biomarkers for lung
disease. And compared to their counterparts who were not exposed to
the oil spill, a higher proportion of exposed fishermen also showed
chromosomal abnormalities in the immune cells known as lymphocytes,
which the authors conjecture might be a harbinger of later
Although it's not at all clear what the long-term or even
mid-term effects of the Deepwater disaster are likely to be, people
involved in the clean-up at least need to be aware of potential
risks, experts noted.
"When you have this massive of a spill, the number of people working out there have to be aware of the potential effects of being immersed in a hot, petroleum-rich environment where people are inhaling fumes," said Dr. Jeff Kalina, associate medical director of the emergency department at The Methodist Hospital in Houston.
The authors of the Spanish paper followed 501 fishermen who had
been exposed during the clean-up of 67,000 tons of bunker oil off
Galicia, Spain, comparing their health to 177 non-exposed fishermen
two years after the spill.
Oil-exposed fishermen were 8 percent more likely to have lower
respiratory tract symptoms than their non-exposed counterparts.
Some also had indications that their airways were trying to heal
themselves, indicating some type of previous injury.
Not surprisingly, fishermen who had had more exposure to fumes
and chemicals were more likely to exhibit problems than those who
had had less contact. The same appears to be coming true in the
Still, there were many differences between the two spills, so
any comparisons with the 50,000 workers who have been toiling in
and near Deepwater need to be taken with a grain of salt, experts
For one thing, the earlier spill involved a very different type
"I think the two events were actually very, very different as far as human exposure was concerned, the reason being that the Spanish spill involved bunker fuel, which is a thoroughly nasty mixture of petroleum ingredients that has a lot of volatile components," said Dr. Arch Carson, director of the Occupational and Environmental Medicine Residency program at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Moreover, Carson added, in Spain, "it was fresh oil on the
surface of the water that actually washed onto the beaches, and
most of the people were exposed to fresh oil."
In the Gulf Coast, he pointed out, most of the oil reaching
shore is extremely weathered or in the form of tar balls or
asphalt. "Most of the volatile stuff is gone," he said.
Differences between the two events are likely compounded by "the
fact that this oil came from a mile down and had to travel through
miles of water before it got to surface," Carson explained. "That
may sound trivial but in actuality it's very important because
moving through that long a water column actually strips quite a bit
of components from the oil, and they dissolve in the water."
Also, it's not clear which, if any, dispersants were used in the
A lot of the health troubles already seen in the Gulf have been
attributed to dispersants that have been used, said Dr. Carl
Boethel, an assistant professor of internal medicine and section
chief of pulmonary medicine at Texas A&M Health Science Center
College of Medicine.
But with both spills, much is still unknown.
"With any type of exposure to any type of chemical, we're still learning so much about all of this," Boethel said. "How do we take this, learn from it and make it better?"
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has more about the
Copyright © 2010
. All rights reserved.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.