Electronic Record-Keeping Alone May Not Boost Health
TUESDAY, Jan. 25 (HealthDay News) -- Electronic health records
have so far done little to improve the quality of health care in
the United States, a new study states.
Researchers from the Stanford University School of Medicine
analyzed data on use of electronic records from 2005 through 2007.
The data came from a nationwide physician survey that encompassed
nearly 250,000 outpatient visits.
Electronic health records (EHR) were used in 30 percent of those
visits, with clinical decision support software, which provides
treatment advice, in place for 17 percent of all visits.
The study, published online Jan. 24 in the
Archives of Internal Medicine, also found that electronic health records were more likely to be used in western states and in group and hospital-affiliated practices than in smaller practices.
"Most studies before ours focused on how single EHR systems work in a few premier academic medical centers, and some of those studies have found significant benefits," study co-author Max Romano said in a Stanford news release.
"Our study takes a different approach: We looked at all non-federal outpatient settings in the United States, from solo private practices to community health centers, to see whether EHRs were having any noticeable impacts in the real world, and we found no significant differences in care quality," said Romano, a former Stanford undergraduate student who is now a medical student at Johns Hopkins.
Dr. Randall Stafford, an associate professor of medicine at the
Stanford Prevention Research Center and the study's senior author,
said in the news release that electronic health records did not
lead to better care because they are "complicated systems used by
individuals who have received little formal training, at least
As a result of this complexity and lack of training, doctors may
not have made full use of electronic record-keeping.
"We've shown that electronic health records and clinical decision support don't by themselves improve quality," Stafford said. "If we want improved quality, we have to look at the whole range of issues that affect quality of care and not put all of our hopes on a single technology."
Other factors that have been shown to affect quality of care, he
indicated, include patients' access to health care, their health
knowledge, doctors' communication skills, the pressures of
outpatient practice and whether the payment physicians receive
rewards good quality care.
The U.S. government's decision to invest in health-care
technology needs to focus more on quality than on simply getting
the technology into the marketplace quickly, Stafford said.
The American Health Information Management Association has more
personal health records.
Copyright © 2011
. All rights reserved.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.