Adherence to Angioplasty/Stent Guidelines Lacking:
MONDAY, July 11 (HealthDay News) -- Many U.S. hospitals don't
follow recently revised guidelines for the appropriate use of
balloon angioplasty and stenting in patients who have a blocked
coronary artery after a heart attack, a new study finds.
A U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute study released
in 2006, called the Occluded Artery Trial (OAT), found that
angioplasty and stenting -- known as percutaneous coronary
intervention (PCI) -- had little effect on patients with blocked
coronary arteries that were detected more than 24 hours after a
heart attack. As a result, the American Heart Association and
American College of Cardiology revised their guidelines for PCI in
In this study, researchers analyzed data from 28,780 patient
visits at 896 U.S. hospitals between 2005 and 2008 in order to
determine whether clinical practice changed after the release of
the study findings and the updated guidelines.
PCI was performed on 11,083 patients before the OAT study was
published, 7,838 between the release of the study and guideline
changes, and 9,859 after the guidelines were revised, the
After they factored in other variables, the study authors found
no overall significant decrease in the monthly rate of PCI
performed for coronary blockages either after the OAT results were
published or after the guidelines were updated.
"In conclusion, among this large cross-section of hospitals in the United States we found only modest evidence that the results of the OAT and its incorporation into major guideline revisions have influenced cardiology and interventional cardiology practice over the subsequent one to two years," wrote Dr. Marc W. Deyell, of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, and colleagues.
"Percutaneous coronary intervention of total occlusions identified greater than 24 hours after [heart attack] remains commonplace despite little evidence to support its use in stable patients and new clinical practice guidelines recommending against it," the researchers reported in the July 11 online edition of the journal Archives of Internal Medicine.
The findings mean that many patients may be undergoing an
expensive procedure that does not help them, the study authors
explained in a journal news release about the report, which is part
of the journal's
Less Is More series.
A number of factors, including difficulties in changing doctors'
and patients' beliefs and behaviors, may play a role in the lack of
adherence to the revised guidelines, Dr. Mauro Moscucci, from the
University of Miami's Miller School of Medicine, pointed out in a
commentary accompanying the study.
The findings add to the spotlight being placed on procedures
that increase health care costs without providing a clear benefit
to patients, he noted.
"While the debate on health care reform is ongoing, health care expenditures in the United States are continuing to escalate. Thus, we must heed the call to professional responsibility aimed at the elimination of tests and treatments that do not result in any benefit for our patients, and for which the net effects will be added costs, waste and possible harm," Moscucci said.
Commenting on the study, Dr. Barry Kaplan, vice chairman of
cardiology at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, N.Y.,
and Long Island Jewish Medical Center in New Hyde Park, N.Y., had
this to say: "The guidelines were updated based on the OAT results
in December 2007. In all medical fields there is usually a one- to
two-year lag between the changes in recommendations by agencies
such as AHA and ACC and adoption and acceptance of these guideline
changes by practicing physicians. This study examined trends from
2005 to 2008 and may have been done too early in order to capture a
change in practice."
In addition, "this study does not account for technological
advances in PCI and other cardiac testing that occurred between the
time period when OAT was enrolling patients and the time period
when this study examined changes in trends," said Kaplan, who was
not involved with the study. "For example, after 2004 the use of
drug-eluting stents has markedly improved the durability of the PCI
result, which may have favorably altered outcomes in OAT [study]
patients," he explained.
The U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute has more
Copyright © 2011
. All rights reserved.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.