Bypass Beats Stents for Diabetic Heart Patients: Study11/05/12
MONDAY, Nov. 5 (HealthDay News) -- For a subset of heart
patients who are both diabetic and have more than one clogged
artery, bypass surgery appears to outperform the use of
artery-widening stents, a major new trial finds.
The study adds more evidence that bypass is the preferred
approach for this type of patient, according to experts discussing
the findings Sunday at the annual meeting of the American Heart
Association in Los Angeles.
"This has the potential to change clinical practice," said Dr. Alice Jacobs, director of the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and interventional cardiology at Boston Medical Center. In her commentary, she said the results of the new trial "add to the consistent evidence base supporting coronary artery bypass grafting as the preferred strategy for patients with diabetes and multi-vessel coronary heart disease."
The findings were also published online Nov. 4 in the
New England Journal of Medicine.
In bypass surgeries, doctors reroute blood flow around a blocked
artery using a grafted vessel taken from another part of the body.
In stenting, doctors use a catheter to insert a thin metal mesh
tube called a stent into the artery, to prop it open.
Bypass has typically outperformed stenting in trials done in the
past, but some experts thought that was only because older stents
tended to re-close too often. Over the past decade, new
drug-eluting stents have been developed that work better at
preventing vessel reclosure.
According to Jacobs, the new trial's launch "was fueled by the
contention that drug-eluting stents would negate the advances of
But the trial, funded by the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and
Blood Institute, found that even with the use of drug-eluting
stents, bypass still came out on top -- at least for very sick,
diabetic heart patients.
The study included 1,900 such patients, 83 percent of whom had
at least three clogged vessels. Patients averaged about 64 years of
age and 71 percent were men.
The research was led by Dr. Valentin Fuster, director of Mount
Sinai Heart at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, in New York
City. He and his colleagues randomly assigned the patients to
receive either bypass surgery or the placement of a drug-eluting
stent. The researchers then tracked patient outcomes for about five
Bypass remains "the preferred method" of keeping arteries
flowing for diabetic heart patients, Fuster said at an AHA press
briefing Sunday. For example, at five years, the rate of a
combination of events such as death from any cause, nonfatal heart
attack or nonfatal stroke was 26.6 percent among those receiving
stents versus 18.7 percent for those who got bypass, Fuster
The five-year rate of heart attack was about 14 percent for
patients receiving stents, but just 6 percent for those who had
There was only one downside to getting bypass: a slight bump up
in the odds for a stroke, from 2.4 percent over five years for
those who got a stent to 5.2 percent for patients who underwent
Jacobs said the impact of a study like this could be
"In the United States alone, we know that nearly 1 million coronary revascularization procedures are performed yearly, and 35 percent of these are performed in patients with diabetes," she said at the press briefing. "We also know that there's a higher incidence of adverse outcomes in patients with diabetes undergoing revascularization."
But what about the relative costs of the two procedures? A
second study, also presented at the AHA meeting, found that over
the long term, bypass beat stenting in that regard as well.
In a sub-analysis of data from of the Fuster-led trial,
Elizabeth Magnuson and colleagues found that even though upfront
costs for bypass were higher, over the long term health-care
dollars were saved, because fewer patients suffered new heart
attacks or needed new operations to re-open arteries.
"Our results demonstrate that bypass surgery is not only beneficial from a clinical standpoint, but also economically attractive from the perspective of the U.S. health care system," Magnusson, director of health economics and technology assessment at Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute in Kansas City, said in an AHA news release.
But one other expert stressed that heart disease care is never a
The new trial "was limited to patients with diabetes and
multi-vessel disease, which likely is a different type of patient
from those with multi-vessel disease who
don'thave diabetes," Dr. David Williams of Brigham and
Women's Hospital, Boston, said at the press briefing.
He believes there may be many patients without diabetes, but
with multi-vessel disease, "for whom bypass surgery offers no
apparent benefit over [stenting]."
Dr. David Friedman is chief of heart failure services at
Plainview Hospital in Plainview, N.Y. He said that a patient's
input is also key to decisions about cardiovascular care.
"I do factor in patient preference, which tends to be for the up-front, less invasive stenting approach," he said. But Friedman also agreed that opting for bypass may mean fewer repeat surgeries down the line.
Learn more about common procedures to unblock arteries at the
American Heart Association.
Copyright © 2012
. All rights reserved.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.