Deadly MERS Virus Detected in Camels12/17/13
TUESDAY, Dec. 17, 2013 (HealthDay News) -- Scientists say they
have the first definitive proof that a deadly respiratory virus in
the Middle East infects camels in addition to humans.
The finding may help researchers find ways to control the spread
of the virus.
Using gene sequencing, the research team found that three camels
from a site where two people contracted Middle East respiratory
syndrome coronavirus (MERS) were also infected with the virus.
The location was a small livestock barn in Qatar. In October,
the 61-year-old barn owner was diagnosed with MERS, followed by a
23-year-old man who worked at the barn.
Within a week of the barn owner's diagnosis, samples were
collected from 14 dromedary camels at the barn. The samples were
sent to laboratories in the Netherlands for genetic analysis and
The genetic analyses confirmed the presence of MERS in three
camels. Genetically, the viruses in the camels were very similar --
but not identical -- to those that infected the barn owner and
All 14 camels had antibodies to MERS, which suggests that the
virus had been circulating among them for some time, enabling most
of them to develop immunity against infection, according to the
study published Dec. 17 in
The Lancet Infectious Diseases.
While the findings provide proof that camels can be infected
with MERS, it's not possible to determine whether the camels
infected the two men or vice versa, said the researchers from the
Netherlands and Qatar.
It's also possible that the men and the camels were infected by
another as-yet unknown source such as cattle, sheep, goats or
wildlife, the researchers added. Further investigation into the
infections is under way.
"An understanding of the role of animals in the transmission of (MERS) is urgently needed to inform control efforts," Neil Ferguson and Maria Van Kerkhove, of Imperial College London in England, wrote in an accompanying editorial in the journal. "This virus can spread from person to person, sometimes causing substantial outbreaks, but whether the virus is capable of self-sustained (i.e., epidemic) human-to-human transmission is unknown."
If self-sustained transmission in people is not yet under way,
the researchers said, intensive control and risk-reduction measures
targeting affected animal species and their handlers might
eliminate the virus from the human population. "Conversely, if
(animal) exposure causes only a small fraction of human infections,
then even intensive veterinary control efforts would have little
effect on cases in people," they concluded.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more
Copyright © 2013
. All rights reserved.
Please be aware that this information is provided to supplement the care provided by your physician. It is neither intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. CALL YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY IF YOU THINK YOU MAY HAVE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider prior to starting any new treatment or with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.